The Direct Democracy Deficit in Two-tier Voting
نویسندگان
چکیده
A large population of citizens have single-peaked preferences over a one-dimensional convex policy space with independently and identically distributed ideal points. They are partitioned into disjoint constituencies C1, . . . , Cm. Collective decisions are determined either in a directly democratic fashion and the implemented policy XD corresponds to the ideal point of the (issue-specific) population median. Or decisions are taken in a two-tier voting system: one representative of each constituency Ci, with his ideal point matching the constituency median, has a voting weight wi; the collective decision XR equals the ideal point of the assembly pivot defined by weight vector (w1, . . . , wm) and a 50%-quota. Monte-Carlo simulations indicate that proportionality of voting weights and the square root of population sizes minimizes the ‘direct democracy deficit’ of two-tier voting, i.e., the expected value of (XD −XR).
منابع مشابه
A note on the direct democracy deficit in two-tier voting
A large population of voters with single-peaked preferences are partitioned into disjoint constituencies. Collective decisions are taken by their representatives, one from each constituency, according to a weighted voting rule. It is assumed that each representative’s ideal point perfectly matches that of the respective constituency median and that top-tier decisions are in the voting game’s co...
متن کاملThe democracy deficit in Canada
The past decade has seen intensified calls for the reform of democratic political institutions in Canada, on the grounds that there is a “democracy deficit” at the level of federal politics. Some commentators have even begun to describe the country as a “banana republic,” or a “friendly dictatorship.” Yet any attempt to assess the state of democracy in Canada must naturally presuppose some theo...
متن کاملLiquid Democracy: An Algorithmic Perspective
We study liquid democracy, a collective decision making paradigm that allows voters to transitively delegate their votes, through an algorithmic lens. In our model, there are two alternatives, one correct and one incorrect, and we are interested in the probability that the majority opinion is correct. Our main question is whether there exist delegation mechanisms that are guaranteed to outperfo...
متن کاملDissociated Choices in Direct Democracy: Preferences, Policy Responsiveness and Trust in Ballot Initiative Elections
Title of Document: DISSOCIATED CHOICES IN DIRECT DEMOCRACY: PREFERENCES, POLICY RESPONSIVENESS AND TRUST IN BALLOT INITIATIVE ELECTIONS Joshua J. Dyck, Ph.D. 2006 Directed By: Professor James G. Gimpel, Department of Government and Politics This research begins with a simple question: do direct democratic voting systems fulfill their promise of generating more majoritarian policy outcomes? I pr...
متن کاملParticipation and e-democracy how to utilize web 2.0 for policy decision-making
This paper investigates in how to utilize ICT and Web 2.0 technologies and e-democracy software for policy decisionmaking. It introduces a cutting edge decision-making system that integrates the practice of e-petitions, e-consultation, e-rulemaking, e-voting, and proxy voting. The paper demonstrates how under precondition of direct democracy through the use this system the collective intelligen...
متن کامل